AI-assisted evidence for ISO/IEC 17025 laboratories

Turn fragmented laboratory records into reviewable evidence.

Engeron uses AI to propose structured, source-referenced values from calibration certificates and supporting records. Engineers verify every candidate, deterministic logic calculates measurement uncertainty, and each approval stays on the record.

Apply for the Pilot See How It Works
Extraction review
Illustrative · Sample data
Supporting record · Calibration certificate C-2214.pdfp. 2
Instrument IDLC-08421Verified
Calibration date2025-02-14Verified
Expanded uncertainty±0.021 kNVerified

Provisional — awaiting engineer verification

Measurement uncertainty

Type A · repeatability0.014 kN
Type B · calibration0.011 kN
Type B · resolution0.003 kN
Combined standard uncertainty, uc0.018 kN
Expanded uncertainty, U (k=2)0.036 kN

Deterministic calculation · complete

Evidence Pack
Approved

The documentation gap

The evidence exists. The review trail is fragmented.

Scattered records

Calibration certificates, spreadsheets, procedures, and approvals live in disconnected systems.

Repeated transcription

The same technical values are re-entered between source records, uncertainty budgets, and reports.

Lost context

Corrections and engineering decisions can be difficult to reconstruct after a result has been issued.

Qualified engineers spend time assembling documentation instead of evaluating technical validity.

How it works

One controlled path from supporting record to Evidence Pack.

  1. 01

    Upload supporting records

    Add calibration certificates and other supporting documents selected by the laboratory.

  2. 02

    AI-assisted extraction candidate

    Engeron proposes structured values and source references.

  3. 03

    Engineer verification

    A qualified engineer verifies, corrects, or rejects every candidate before it can enter the calculation workflow.

  4. 04

    Deterministic calculation

    Verified inputs enter explicit measurement-uncertainty logic.

  5. 05

    ETM and DCS review

    Review evidence links and identify missing expected documentation before approval.

  6. 06

    Engineer approval and export

    An authorized engineer approves the package before the Evidence Pack is marked Approved and exported.

AI assists. Engineers decide. Calculations remain deterministic.

Human-controlled by design

AI never computes your measurement uncertainty. And it never approves your evidence.

Source-referenced candidates

AI reads supporting records and proposes structured candidates with source references. Nothing enters the calculation workflow until an engineer verifies it.

Explicit numerical logic

Measurement-uncertainty values come from deterministic formulas applied to verified inputs—not from a language model.

Accountable approval

Only an authorized engineer can approve the final package, and the approval remains part of the review record.

Inside the pilot workspace

See what supports every result.

Illustrative preview of the controlled-pilot review surfaces. All identifiers and values are fictional sample data.

Controlled pilot workspace
Illustrative · Sample data
  • Overview
  • Extraction Review
  • Measurement Uncertainty
  • Evidence Traceability
  • Review & Export

Evidence traceability

C
  • Uncertainty componentCert. #C-2214Linked
  • Method referenceSOP-GT-11Linked
  • Approval recordpendingMissing
  • Environmental logEnv-2025-02Linked

Illustrative · Sample data

DCS · Internal documentation-completeness indicator82 / 100

Documentation completeness only — not a conformity, compliance, accreditation, certification, maturity, or technical-validity score.

Reviewable output

Export the review trail—not only the final number.

After engineer approval, Engeron generates a reviewable Evidence Pack that brings together verified inputs, deterministic calculation results, linked evidence, ETM review, DCS review, and the approval record.

The Evidence Pack supports technical review. It is not an accreditation, certification, compliance, or conformity decision.

Evidence Pack
Approved

Illustrative · Sample data

  • Verified inputs
  • Deterministic calculation results
  • Linked supporting evidence
  • ETM review
  • DCS review
  • Engineer approval record

For laboratories

Reviewable evidence, aligned with laboratory responsibilities.

Laboratory Director

See the status of evidence, technical review, approvals, and export preparation.

Quality Manager

Review documentation completeness and maintain a clearer evidence trail.

Technical Manager

Control verified inputs, calculation review, and approval decisions.

Laboratory Engineer / MU Specialist

Reduce repeated transcription while retaining responsibility for technical validation.

Initial pilot focus: geotechnical and rock-mechanics testing laboratories.

Research context

Developed from laboratory workflow and measurement-uncertainty research.

EUROCK 2026 · Skopje · 15–19 September 2026

Engeron's initial framework uses point-load strength testing as a reference workflow for evaluating measurement-uncertainty documentation in an ISO/IEC 17025 laboratory context. Quantitative findings will be published only when their review basis and supporting records can be fully documented.

References to EUROCK 2026, ISO/IEC 17025, or professional organizations provide context only and do not imply endorsement by EUROCK, ISRM, ISO, IEC, an accreditation body, or any professional association.

Controlled pilot

Bring one laboratory method into a controlled pilot.

Engeron is selecting a small number of laboratory professionals and organizations—initially in geotechnical and rock-mechanics testing—for discovery interviews and controlled-pilot evaluation.

ISO/IEC 17025 accreditation status *

Describe the workflow problem, but do not include laboratory documents, certificates, customer information, personal data about other people or other confidential material.

Optional context (helps us prioritise)
I'm interested in

Submitting this application does not guarantee pilot participation. Qualified applicants may be invited to a workflow interview or later pilot discussion.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Does AI calculate measurement uncertainty?

No. AI proposes structured extraction candidates with source references. Verified inputs enter deterministic calculation logic, and an engineer remains responsible for technical review and approval.

What is the Evidence Traceability Matrix?

The ETM links uncertainty sources and documentation requirements to supporting evidence so reviewers can see what is missing, provisional, or verified.

What is the Documentation Completeness Score?

DCS is an internal documentation-review aid. It indicates whether expected evidence is present. It is not a compliance, conformity, accreditation, certification, maturity, or technical-validity score.

What is an Evidence Pack?

It is the reviewable output produced after engineer approval. In the controlled-pilot workflow, it brings together verified inputs, deterministic calculation results, linked evidence, ETM and DCS review, and the approval record.

Does Engeron provide accreditation or certification decisions?

No. Engeron does not accredit laboratories, certify conformity, guarantee compliance, or replace competent technical judgment.

Who is the controlled pilot for?

The initial focus is accredited and accreditation-seeking geotechnical and rock-mechanics testing laboratories working with measurement-uncertainty documentation.

When will Engeron be available?

Engeron is under controlled pilot development. Availability and participation depend on laboratory fit, pilot scope, and technical readiness.